Studying Arrhythmic Risk with In-Silico Programmed Ventricular Stimulation and Patient-Specific Computational Models
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14112 LNCS, Page: 41-51
2023
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Conference Paper Description
Cardiac arrhythmias can be life-threatening, and early identification of patients at high risk of developing arrhythmias is crucial to implementing preventive measures. Programmed ventricular stimulation (PVS) is a clinical tool to assess arrhythmic risk. In this study, we developed patient-specific computational models using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data to evaluate arrhythmic risk through virtual PVS simulations. We applied virtual PVS on a patient with dilated cardiomyopathy and a history of non-sustained ventricular tachycardia. The simulation results revealed the presence of cardiac arrhythmias in the form of spiral waves circulating a fibrotic scar in the patient’s heart. These findings, consistent with the patient’s medical history, indicate that patient-specific computational models hold great promise as a tool for assessing cardiac arrhythmic risk. The patient-specific computational models have the potential to assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and developing personalized treatment plans. By incorporating patient-specific information and simulating various scenarios, computational models can provide valuable insights into the underlying mechanisms of arrhythmia and guide clinical decision-making.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85165096995&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37129-5_4; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-37129-5_4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-37129-5_4; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-37129-5_4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know