Exploring the Suitability of the TOE Framework and DOI Theory Towards Understanding AI Adoption as Part of Sociotechnical Systems
Communications in Computer and Information Science, ISSN: 1865-0937, Vol: 1878 CCIS, Page: 228-240
2023
- 8Citations
- 28Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Organisations that fail to adopt AI, will lose out on new business opportunities or optimisation and efficiency potential. This study is interested in contributing to increasing the likelihood of achieving the organisational adoption of AI that has a positive outcome. AI is part of complex sociotechnical systems, and an organisation can be seen as a giant cybernetic collective, with a shared objective function. We argue that the technological-organisational-environmental (TOE) framework provides a sound theoretical lens in analysing how an organisation’s context influences the adoption and implementation of AI. Furthermore, the diffusion of innovation (DOI) theory is proposed to identify enablers for transforming organisations. Together with the combination of DOI and TOE, the stages of diffusion is proposed as an evaluation paradigm in order to evaluate the effectiveness of the enabling factors. Furthermore, the elements and objectives of AI adoption in the context of data-driven organisations are included. This approach, therefore, caters for both the technical and social AI adoption elements and an organisational environment where complex symbiotic relationships prevail. Additionally, on a theoretical level, it aids in enhancing our understanding of the causal factors behind the successful or unsuccessful adoption of AI within organisations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85172731582&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39652-6_15; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-39652-6_15; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39652-6_15; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-39652-6_15
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know