Canal wall down v/s canal wall up
Textbook of Otitis Media: The Basics and Beyond, Page: 615-623
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
The decision to choose between a canal wall-down (CWD) or canal wall-up (CWU) surgery for cholesteatoma presents a medical dilemma. Although extensively discussed in the literature, the topic remains controversial. Both techniques have powerful arguments in their favor, with the main objectives of surgical management being the complete eradication of the disease and prevention of recurrence and improvement of the patient's hearing and quality of life, while minimizing future complications. In most cases, the surgeon's decision is based on their personal experience and patient's characteristics. Despite the ongoing debate, there is a tendency toward performing CWU over CWD surgery. This chapter provides an updated review of both surgical techniques, reconstruction methods, use of intraoperative endoscopes, and clinical outcomes. Additionally, it presents the preferences and opinions of expert otologists on both techniques.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85197384309&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40949-3_55; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-40949-3_55; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-40949-3_55; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-40949-3_55
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know