Researching cybersecurity governance: Insights from fieldwork with cybersecurity experts and end-users
Fieldwork Experiences in Criminology and Security Studies: Methods, Ethics, and Emotions, Page: 485-509
2023
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Book Chapter Description
The field of cybersecurity governance research strives to understand, rationalize, and propose effective solutions for the complex task of safeguarding cyberspace as a secure environment. Concurrently, social research focuses on comprehending the institutions, policies, and behaviours that foster a safer online realm. This type of inquiry often relies on the expertise of professionals or involves research conducted directly with end-users. However, conducting fieldwork with these specific groups presents unique challenges pertaining to the subject matter. In this chapter, we aim to share our first-hand experiences of conducting fieldwork in cybersecurity, engaging with both experts and end-users. Our experiences stem from three distinct projects centred around governance, culture, and cybersecurity training. Throughout this chapter, we delve into the logistical, ethical, and emotional challenges we encountered along the research journey, highlighting the successes and missteps we encountered. By sharing our experiences and lessons learned, we contribute to the ongoing discourse in this field and offer valuable insights for future research endeavours.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85194999874&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41574-6_26; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-41574-6_26; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-41574-6_26; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-41574-6_26
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know