Scalable Model Selection for Staged Trees: Mean-posterior Clustering and Binary Trees
Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, ISSN: 2194-1017, Vol: 435, Page: 23-34
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Several structure-learning algorithms for staged trees, asymmetric extensions of Bayesian networks, have been proposed. However, these do not scale efficiently as the number of variables considered increases, a priori restricting the set of models, or they do not find comparable models to existing methods. Here, we define an alternative algorithm based on a totally-ordered hyperstage. We demonstrate how it can be used to obtain a quadratically-scaling structural learning algorithm for staged trees that restricts the model space a posteriori. Through comparative analysis, we show that through the ordering provided by the mean posterior distributions, we can outperform existing methods in computational time whilst providing comparable model scores. This method also enables us to learn more complex relationships than existing model selection techniques by expanding the model space. We illustrate how this can embellish inferences in a real study.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85180151153&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42413-7_3; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-42413-7_3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-42413-7_3; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-42413-7_3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know