Permanent Changes in Clinical Engineering Procedures Since COVID-19 in OECD Countries
IFMBE Proceedings, ISSN: 1433-9277, Vol: 97, Page: 222-231
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The COVID-19 pandemic has impacted clinical engineering procedures, including medical technology management, training and technical support, quality risk management, and research and development. This research aims to highlight the permanent changes in clinical engineering practices that emerged due to the pandemic in OECD member countries. By analyzing sources of information, this study examines how the adoption of technologies and digitization of healthcare have been accelerated during the pandemic. The findings are presented in implementations focused on telemedicine, big data, and digital health while also identifying areas of opportunity and challenges for the ongoing adoption of these measures. This abstract provides a succinct summary of the research's focus, objectives, and key findings related to the impact of COVID-19 on clinical engineering procedures and the consequent transformations in healthcare practices.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85177453624&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46936-7_24; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-46936-7_24; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-46936-7_24; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-46936-7_24
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know