Optimisation Models for Scheduling Extraordinary University Exams with a Minimum Rest Time Between Consecutive Exams
Springer Proceedings in Mathematics and Statistics, ISSN: 2194-1017, Vol: 431, Page: 93-105
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The scheduling extraordinary exams problem has specific characteristics that make the models for scheduling ordinary exams inapplicable. Some of these characteristics are that exams are only scheduled for subjects requested by students and the impossibility of overlapping exams requested by the same student. This paper proposes an optimisation tool for scheduling extraordinary university exams based on two mixed integer linear programming (MILP) models. The first aims to schedule the most demanded subjects first to leave more correction time for the subjects with more students. It also ensures a minimum rest time between two consecutive exams for all students to improve their academic performance. If all students cannot reach the defined minimum rest time, the model will be unfeasible. In this case, it is possible to decrease the minimum rest time to a lower limit to find a feasible solution. If a feasible solution is not found, a second MILP model is proposed for scheduling exams without considering the requirement for time off between exams but minimising the number of non-compliances with this requirement. These models are applied to the School of Industrial Engineering of the Universitat Politècnica de València (Spain). It is concluded that achieving a schedule that ensures the minimum rest time set by the school for all students is infeasible. Therefore, the second model is solved. The solution shows that the average rest time between two consecutive exams increases considerably compared to the first model, ensuring compliance with the minimum rest time set for 93% of the students.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85180799470&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47058-5_9; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-47058-5_9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47058-5_9; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-47058-5_9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know