Knowledge Graph-Based Framework to Support the Human-Centric Approach
Springer Series in Advanced Manufacturing, ISSN: 2196-1735, Vol: Part F2029, Page: 127-156
2024
- 7Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures7
- Readers7
Book Chapter Description
This chapter proposes the Human-Centric Knowledge Graph (HCKG) framework by adapting ontologies and standards that can model the operator-related factors such as monitoring movements, working conditions or collaboration with robots. Furthermore, graph-based data queries, visualization and analytics are also presented in the form of an industrial case study. The main contribution of this work is a knowledge graph-based framework, where the work performed by the operator is of concern, including the evaluation of movements, collaboration with machines, ergonomics and other conditions. Additionally, utilization of the framework is demonstrated in a complex assembly line-based use case, by applying examples of resource allocation and comprehensive support concerning collaboration between the shop-floor workers and ergonomic aspects. The importance of highly monitored and analyzed processes connected by information systems such as knowledge graphs is increasing. Moreover, the integration of operators has also become urgent due to their high costs and from a social point of view. An adequate framework to implement the Industry 5.0 approach requires effective data exchange in a highly complex manufacturing network to utilize resources and information. Furthermore, the continuous development of collaboration between human and machine actors is fundamental for Industrial Cyber-Physical Systems, as the workforce is one of the most agile and flexible manufacturing resources.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85182816741&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47444-6_5; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-47444-6_5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47444-6_5; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-47444-6_5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know