Uncovering Bias in the Face Processing Pipeline: An Analysis of Popular and State-of-the-Art Algorithms Across Demographic Groups
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14318 LNAI, Page: 245-264
2023
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Numerous algorithms process face images to perform tasks such as person identification and estimation of attributes such as the race and gender. While previous work has focused on biases in face recognition systems, relatively limited work has considered the full face processing pipeline to determine if other components also exhibit any biases related to a person’s demographic attributes. An evaluation of popular and state-of-the-art methods in the face processing pipeline reveals that, although the overall performance may appear satisfactory, numerous differences are uncovered when digging deeper to consider the performance not just within a single demographic group, but also across different types of groups. Several avenues of future work are also provided.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85177241430&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47546-7_17; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-47546-7_17; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47546-7_17; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-47546-7_17
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know