Multifractal Analysis in Neuroimaging
Advances in Neurobiology, ISSN: 2190-5223, Vol: 36, Page: 79-93
2024
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
- Captures3
- Readers3
Book Chapter Description
The characteristics of biomedical signals are not captured by conventional measures like the average amplitude of the signal. The methodologies derived from fractal geometry have been a very useful approach to study the degree of irregularity of a signal. The monofractal analysis of a signal is defined by a single power-law exponent in assuming a scale invariance in time and space. However, temporal and spatial variation in the scale-invariant structure of the biomedical signal often appears. In this case, multifractal analysis is well-suited because it is defined by a multifractal spectrum of power-law exponents. There are several approaches to the implementation of this analysis, and there are numerous ways to present these. In this chapter, we review the use of multifractal analysis for the purpose of characterizing signals in neuroimaging. After describing the tenets of multifractal analysis, we present several approaches to estimating the multifractal spectrum. Finally, we describe the applications of this spectrum on biomedical signals in the characterization of several diseases in neurosciences.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85187801698&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47606-8_4; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/38468028; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-47606-8_4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-47606-8_4; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-47606-8_4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know