Feasibility Study of Materials on Developing Green Materials to Achieve Sustainability in Building Construction
Advances in Science, Technology and Innovation, ISSN: 2522-8722, Page: 77-87
2024
- 12Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures12
- Readers12
- 12
Conference Paper Description
The industrial operations and infrastructure-related activities are causing global environmental challenges. Therefore, there is growing interest in developing renewable technologies and using sustainable materials. Sustainable, easily attainable, durable, easily maintained, and adaptable building materials are the wave of the future. The idea of using a wide variety of eco-friendly materials in building construction stems from the fact that these products have desirable qualities such as low carbon footprints, quick installation times, and resistance to earthquakes and fire. In order to meet this demand, scientists studied the effects of combining different types of plastic, marble dust, fly ash, glass fiber-reinforced gypsum, light-transmitting concrete, and bamboo. In the preliminary analysis, a questionnaire was distributed to various stakeholders to gather their thoughts on environmentally friendly materials. Following the first survey, the data is analyzed utilizing Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) software to rank the detected risks related to building activities. There was a massive survey with questionnaires and plenty of numbers crunched. Materials like GFRG panels, plastic waste, AAC blocks, fly ash, etc., have seen increased adoption due to positive responses. The analysis’s primary finding is that sustainable use of green materials in building construction is feasible thanks to the widespread availability of low-cost, high-performance green materials on the market.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85189561858&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50024-4_8; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-50024-4_8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50024-4_8; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-50024-4_8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know