Development of PEEK Matrix Polymer Composite and Additive Manufacturing by Pellet Extrusion Method
Conference Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Mechanics Series, ISSN: 2191-5652, Page: 1-6
2024
- 1Citations
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Within the context of this study, it is intended to develop new biocompatible polymer-based composite materials. For this purpose, PEEK (polyether ether ketone) was used as the matrix of the composites, and carbon nanotube (CNT) was used as the reinforcement. The PEEK matrix and 1 wt. % CNTs were melt mixed in a twin-screw extruder to obtain the compound in the form of pellets. Then, using these pellets, composites were manufactured using a pellet extruder type 3D printer. After manufacturing, microstructure of the specimens was observed using optical microscopy, and mechanical characterization was performed through three-point bending tests and Charpy impact tests. The most noteworthy result of the microscopy was the absence of any discontinuity between the layers of the specimen for pure PEEK specimens. Furthermore, the mechanical improvement was not apparent by the CNT incorporation for the tested composites. In conclusion, pellet extrusion is thought as a promising tool for the manufacturing of biocompatible materials for biomedical applications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85187701823&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50470-9_1; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-50470-9_1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50470-9_1; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-50470-9_1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know