Learning Markov Chain Models from Sequential Data Under Local Differential Privacy
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14345 LNCS, Page: 359-379
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
Markov chain models are frequently used in the analysis and modeling of sequential data such as location traces, time series, natural language, and speech. However, considering that many data sources are privacy-sensitive, it is imperative to design privacy-preserving methods for learning Markov models. In this paper, we propose Prima for learning discrete-time Markov chain models under local differential privacy (LDP), a state-of-the-art privacy standard. In Prima, each user locally encodes and perturbs their sequential record on their own device using LDP protocols. For this purpose, we adapt two bitvector-based LDP protocols (RAPPOR and OUE); and furthermore, we develop a novel extension of the GRR protocol called AdaGRR. We also propose to utilize custom privacy budget allocation strategies for perturbation, which enable uneven splitting of the privacy budget to better preserve utility in cases with uneven sequence lengths. On the server-side, Prima uses a novel algorithm for estimating Markov probabilities from perturbed data. We experimentally evaluate Prima using three real-world datasets, four utility metrics, and under various combinations of privacy budget and budget allocation strategies. Results show that Prima enables learning Markov chains under LDP with high utility and low error compared to Markov chains learned without privacy constraints.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85182588570&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51476-0_18; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-51476-0_18; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-51476-0_18; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-51476-0_18
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know