Characterizing the Features of Mitotic Figures Using a Conditional Diffusion Probabilistic Model
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14533 LNCS, Page: 121-131
2024
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures4
- Readers4
Conference Paper Description
Mitotic figure detection in histology images is a hard-to-define, yet clinically significant task, where labels are generated with pathologist interpretations and where there is no “gold-standard” independent ground-truth. However, it is well-established that these interpretation based labels are often unreliable, in part, due to differences in expertise levels and human subjectivity. In this paper, our goal is to shed light on the inherent uncertainty of mitosis labels and characterize the mitotic figure classification task in a human interpretable manner. We train a probabilistic diffusion model to synthesize patches of cell nuclei for a given mitosis label condition. Using this model, we can then generate a sequence of synthetic images that correspond to the same nucleus transitioning into the mitotic state. This allows us to identify different image features associated with mitosis, such as cytoplasm granularity, nuclear density, nuclear irregularity and high contrast between the nucleus and the cell body. Our approach offers a new tool for pathologists to interpret and communicate the features driving the decision to recognize a mitotic figure.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85187709965&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53767-7_12; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-53767-7_12; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53767-7_12; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-53767-7_12
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know