Application of Machine Learning to Improve Safety in the Wind Industry
Intelligent Systems Reference Library, ISSN: 1868-4408, Vol: 60, Page: 123-165
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Book Chapter Description
The offshore wind industry has been gaining significant attention in recent years, as the world looks to transition to more sustainable energy sources. While the industry has successfully reduced costs and increased efficiency, there is still room for improvement in terms of safety for workers. Using machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) technologies can significantly improve offshore wind industry safety by facilitating better accident prediction and failure prevention. The current study aims to fill a significant gap in the existing literature by developing a useful selection of machine learning models for simple implementation in the offshore wind industry. These models will then be used to inform decision-making around safety measures, such as scheduling maintenance or repairs or changing work practices to reduce risk. The development of this tool has the potential to significantly contribute to the long-term viability of the offshore wind industry and the protection of its workers. By providing accurate predictions of potential accidents and failures, the tool can enable companies to take proactive measures to prevent incidents from occurring, reducing the risk of injury or death to workers and reducing the financial cost of accidents and downtime. The chapter concludes with a summary of the present study's research challenge and the literature gaps. It highlights the importance of developing effective machine learning models and implementing stricter data records to improve safety in the offshore wind industry and the potential impact of these tools on the long-term viability of the industry. The chapter also notes that the high performance of selected models proves the reliability of the expected predictions and demonstrates the effectiveness of machine learning models for decision- making around safety in the offshore wind industry.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85191414609&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54038-7_5; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-54038-7_5; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54038-7_5; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-54038-7_5
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know