Enhancing Knee Meniscus Damage Prediction from MRI Images with Machine Learning and Deep Learning Techniques
Communications in Computer and Information Science, ISSN: 1865-0937, Vol: 1991 CCIS, Page: 141-155
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
This paper investigates the application of machine learning and deep learning models to predict knee meniscus damage from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans. We utilized the MRNet dataset, and processed it with different approaches, using a one-dimensional grayscale, RGB, and segmented images, complemented with features extracted using Histogram of Oriented Gradients (HOG) and Scale-Invariant Feature Transform (SIFT) techniques. Our objective was to evaluate whether a DL model could match or exceed the diagnostic performance of clinical experts such as general radiologists and orthopedic surgeons. Our findings demonstrate that our ML and DL models can predict meniscal tears with comparable accuracy to that of general medical doctors. This suggests that ML and DL models have potential to deliver rapid preliminary results post-MRI exams and augment the quality of MRI diagnoses, particularly in settings lacking specialist radiologists. Thus, integrating ML and DL models into clinical practice could enhance the quality and consistency of MRI interpretation for knee meniscus damage.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85187646106&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54321-0_10; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-54321-0_10; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-54321-0_10; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-54321-0_10
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know