Proteins and Polypeptides as Biomaterials Inks for 3D Printing
Handbook of the Extracellular Matrix: Biologically-Derived Materials, Page: 295-328
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Book Chapter Description
Protein-based materials have recently gained extensive attention as ink and bioink for 3D printing application due to their tunable properties and biocompatibility with the ability to mimic the biochemistry of the cell’s extracellular matrix (ECM). The presence of multiple functional groups on the polymer chains of these naturally derived materials makes them suitable candidates for different crosslinking methods such as physical gelation, chemical and enzymatic reactions, as well as photocrosslinking methods which are the essential step for the filament formation in 3D printing processes. However, batch-to-batch variation of the protein materials due to the diversity in resources and the extraction methods remains a challenge. This chapter provides an overview of the major proteins as ink materials and the crosslinking methods that have been used to tune their properties for 3D printing.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85212736638&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56363-8_15; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-56363-8_15; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-56363-8_15; https://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-031-56363-8_15
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know