Fast Symbolic Computation of Bottom SCCs
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14572 LNCS, Page: 110-128
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The computation of bottom strongly connected components (BSCCs) is a fundamental task in model checking, as well as in characterizing the attractors of dynamical systems. As such, symbolic algorithms for BSCCs have received special attention, and are based on the idea that the computation of an SCC can be stopped early, as soon as it is deemed to be non-bottom. In this paper we introduce PENDANT, a new symbolic algorithm for computing BSCCs which runs in linear symbolic time. In contrast to the standard approach of escaping non-bottom SCCs, PENDANT aims to start the computation from nodes that are likely to belong to BSCCs, and thus is more effective in sidestepping SCCs that are non-bottom. Moreover, we employ a simple yet powerful deadlock-detection technique, that quickly identifies singleton BSCCs before the main algorithm is run. Our experimental evaluation on three diverse datasets of 553 models demonstrates the efficacy of our two methods: PENDANT is decisively faster than the standard existing algorithm for BSCC computation, while deadlock detection improves the performance of each algorithm significantly.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85192224735&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57256-2_6; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-57256-2_6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-57256-2_6; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-57256-2_6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know