Forensic-Ready Analysis Suite: A Tool Support for Forensic-Ready Software Systems Design
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, ISSN: 1865-1356, Vol: 514 LNBIP, Page: 47-55
2024
- 1Citations
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Forensic-ready software systems integrate preparedness for digital forensic investigation into their design. It includes ensuring the production of potential evidence with sufficient coverage and quality to improve the odds of successful investigation or admissibility. However, the design of such software systems is challenging without in-depth forensic readiness expertise. Thus, this paper presents a tool suite to help the designer. It includes a graphical editor for creating system models in BPMN4FRSS notation, an extended BPMN with forensic readiness constructs, and an analyser utilising Z3 solver for satisfiability checking of formulas derived from the models. It verifies the models’ validity, provides targeted hints to enhance forensic readiness capabilities, and allows for what-if analysis of potential evidence quality.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85193597552&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59468-7_6; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-59468-7_6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59468-7_6; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-59468-7_6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know