Can Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans be Mega-projects? Evidence from the City of Brescia, Italy
Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering, ISSN: 2366-2565, Vol: 493 LNCE, Page: 184-202
2024
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures8
- Readers8
Conference Paper Description
In the field of Transport Engineering, megaprojects are typically major infrastructure works that require a long planning and design phase and significant resources to be realized. However, considering the several definitions of megaprojects available in technical-scientific literature, one may consider mega-projects from another point of view: according to a systemic perspective, a megaproject could also be a master project including several sub-projects that, all together, compose a wider system. Likewise, Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans (SUMP) can be associated with the master-project that draws specific strategies to enhance urban mobility efficiency, by implementing and coordinating several transport and infrastructure projects (e.g., Mass Rapid Transits, cycling infrastructure, road infrastructure, etc.). Having this in mind, the aim of the paper is to read Sustainable Urban Mobility Plans as a mega-project. Specifically, the case study of the city of Brescia (Italy) considered and analyzed to provide a comparison among the characteristics of a mega-project and the ones of a SUMP. Indeed, the Plan include several transport interventions (i.e., a tramway line, a Bus Rapid Transit, and others) over a time span of 10–20 years that together require investments of more than 1 billion euros and will have great impact over people, places, and environment.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85195131195&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59703-9_14; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-59703-9_14; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-59703-9_14; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-59703-9_14
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know