Reducing Human Annotation Effort Using Self-supervised Learning for Image Segmentation
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14734 LNAI, Page: 436-445
2024
- 1Citations
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Citations1
- Citation Indexes1
Conference Paper Description
Image segmentation stands out as one of the most computationally demanding computer vision tasks, posing challenges not only due to the substantial computational resources required for training but also the scarcity of available annotation masks. The creation of a sizable collection of accurate segmentation annotation masks is notorious for being labor-intensive and time-consuming, often acting as a significant bottleneck in image segmentation projects. This paper delves into the intricacies of human effort involved in traditional segmentation annotation and explores the potential impact of self-supervised learning (SSL) as a promising solution. Ultimately, we contend that, despite the tradeoffs inherent in existing SSL approaches for image segmentation, a new alternative leveraging foundation models for image segmentation, capable of zero-shot segmentation across extensive object categories, could emerge as a novel solution that reduces human effort in both annotation and model development.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85196138335&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60606-9_26; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-60606-9_26; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-60606-9_26; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-60606-9_26
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know