Object-Centric Conformance Alignments with Synchronization
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14663 LNCS, Page: 3-19
2024
- 5Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Real-world processes operate on objects that are inter-dependent. To accurately reflect the nature of such processes, object-centric process mining techniques are needed, notably conformance checking. However, while the object-centric perspective has recently gained traction, few concrete process mining techniques have been presented so far. Moreover, existing approaches are severely limited in their abilities to keep track of object identity and object dependencies. Consequently, serious problems in event logs with object information remain undetected. This paper, presents a new formalism that combines the key modelling features of two existing approaches, notably the ability of object-centric Petri nets to capture one-to-many relations and the ability of Petri nets with identifiers to compare and synchronize objects based on their identity. We call the resulting formalism object-centric Petri nets with identifiers, and define alignments and the conformance checking task for this setting. We propose a conformance checking approach for such nets based on an encoding in satisfiability modulo theories (SMT), and illustrate how it serves to effectively overcome shortcomings of earlier work. To assess its practicality, we evaluate it on data from the literature.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85196744531&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61057-8_1; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-61057-8_1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-61057-8_1; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-61057-8_1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know