Adaptable Configuration of Decentralized Monitors
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14678 LNCS, Page: 197-217
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Prominent challenges in runtime verification of a distributed system are the correct placement, configuration, and coordination of the monitoring nodes. This work considers state-of-the-art decentralized monitoring practices and proposes a framework to recommend efficient configurations of the monitoring system depending on the target specification. Our approach aims to optimize communication over several features (e.g., minimizing the number of messages exchanged, the number of computations happening overall, etc.) in contexts where finding an efficient communication strategy requires slow simulations. We optimize by training multiple machine learning models from simulations combining traces, formulae, and systems of different sizes. The experimental results show that the developed model can reliably suggest the best configuration strategy in a few nanoseconds, contrary to the minutes or possibly hours required by direct simulations that would be impractical at runtime.
Bibliographic Details
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know