Scalable Data Profiling for Quality Analytics Extraction
IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, ISSN: 1868-422X, Vol: 715 IFIPAICT, Page: 177-189
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In today’s modern society, data play an integral role in the development global industry, since they have become a valuable asset for companies, institutions, governments, and others. At the same time, data generated daily, at a global scale, require significant resources to pre-process, filter and store. When it comes to acquiring such stored data, it is essential to understand which dataset fits to the needs of the user beforehand. One particularly important factor is the quality of a dataset, which could be determined based on a series of quality related attributes generated by it. Such attributes constitute “Profiling”, the process of obtaining information from a data sample, related to the complete dataset’s quality. However, in the era of Big Data, the ability to apply profiling techniques in complete large datasets should also be considered, in order to obtain complete quality insights. This paper attempts to provide a solution for this consideration by presenting “DaQuE”, a scalable framework for efficient profiling and quality analytics extraction in complete datasets of all volumes.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85199206369&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63227-3_12; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-63227-3_12; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-63227-3_12; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-63227-3_12
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know