Human Digital Twins: Efficient Privacy-Preserving Access Control Through Views Pre-materialisation
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14901 LNCS, Page: 24-43
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
Digital Twins (DTs) are virtual copies of physical entities, processes, or systems used for various tasks, such as controlling, monitoring, and analysing the status of the real entity. The DT sector is expected to surpass six billion U.S. dollars by 2025, with the Human Digital Twin (HDT) being a prime example. HDTs are being used in various applications, such as personalised medicine, healthcare, and education. However, the materialisation of HDTs can be costly and lead to delays in HDT-based services. To overcome this, we propose a strategy, HDT-ViewMat, to identify the portions of an HDT that should be pre-materialised, considering the trade-off between potential delays and resource waste. The proposed strategy analyses the process/workflow that requires HDT data to estimate the probability of its tasks being executed. Furthermore, due to the sensitivity of the data maintained by the HDTs, access to them must be limited to guarantee the users’ privacy. This strategy also considers the compliance of privacy policies with users’ preferences. HDT-ViewMat assesses the user’s chance of executing a task in the workflow based on the probability of the task’s invocation and the probability of the user accepting the policies of the corresponding service provider.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85200578532&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65172-4_2; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-65172-4_2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65172-4_2; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-65172-4_2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know