Three-Way Conflict Analysis with Negative Feedback
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14840 LNAI, Page: 196-209
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Conflict often arises when individuals have different opinions. Owing to the ubiquity of conflict, conflict analysis is always widely discussed. Recently, the three-way conflict analysis proposed by Yao has attracted much attention. In Yao’s framework, each three-way conflict model consists of the whole, trisections, and final results. However, the final results are induced once a trisection is given. In other words, the model cannot correct the final results. Therefore, we provide a new conflict analysis framework with negative feedback. This way, we can deliver better results, even when we are not given proper thresholds in advance. In addition, we provide three algorithms for three-way conflict models with negative feedback in this paper after showing the new framework. In the third algorithm, we focus on coalitions instead of trisections while improving thresholds, which distinguishes greatly from previous models.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85200696401&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65668-2_14; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-65668-2_14; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65668-2_14; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-65668-2_14
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know