Exploring Collaborative Learning Constructs in the Metaverse: A Pilot Study
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14785 LNCS, Page: 129-135
2024
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Conference Paper Description
Metaverse, specifically defined and previously known as virtual worlds, has recently gained wide attention from the public to education. Prior literature has validated this immersive virtual reality (VR) on facilitating students’ problem-solving, communication, and collaboration. However, many challenges including learning outcomes may result from the scarcity of investigation in collaborative learning activities. Accordingly, this study adopted the repertory grid (RG) technique to identify the collaborative learning constructs in the virtual worlds; we also assessed the RG procedure and modified the constructs for subsequent studies. During the process, six experts from academics and schools were recruited to design activity planners for construct elicitation. After completing the RG survey by the other 6 participants, the consistency results revealed a moderate correlation between two participants both possessing higher related experiences. Most importantly, based on the participants’ feedback, this study successfully streamlined the RG flow and determined a 24-construct grid for the upcoming research.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85200689378&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65881-5_14; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-65881-5_14; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-65881-5_14; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-65881-5_14
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know