Conventional Machine Learning-Based Android Malware Detectors
Advances in Information Security, ISSN: 2512-2193, Vol: 91, Page: 175-196
2025
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Book Chapter Description
Android operating system provides various services to users. However, its widespread use has also attracted individuals developing malicious software to exploit vulnerabilities. Indeed, malware developers target Android markets to distribute harmful apps, leading to drastic consequences such as financially exploiting Android users. In tackling the challenges posed by Android malware, machine learning has emerged as a promising tool for automatic detection. The literature on Android malware detection is rich with a variety of ML-based approaches designed to distinguish malware from legitimate samples. In this chapter, we overview five state-of-the-art Android malware detectors that rely on machine learning. Specifically, we present the dataset used in their performance evaluation. We delve into the feature set adopted by the different approaches and describe how they are embedded in vector spaces. Furthermore, we conduct an in-depth exploration of the classification process, including the ML algorithms used, their hyper-parameters, and the methodology employed in the evaluation. Additionally, we provide examples showcasing the performance effectiveness of the studied approaches. Lastly, we discuss the limitations and challenges of ML-based malware detectors that need to be overcome to advance the research field.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85211144507&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66245-4_7; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-66245-4_7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66245-4_7; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-66245-4_7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know