Multilingual Detection of Cyberbullying on Social Networks Using a Fine-Tuned GPT-3.5 Model
Communications in Computer and Information Science, ISSN: 1865-0937, Vol: 2172 CCIS, Page: 252-263
2024
- 15Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures15
- Readers15
- 15
Conference Paper Description
Cyberbullying on social networks has emerged as a global problem with serious consequences on the mental health of victims, mainly children, and adolescents. Although there are AI-based solutions to address this issue, they face limitations such as a lack of multilingual datasets, detecting sarcasm, and detecting idioms. Research presents an innovative approach to effective cyberbullying detection using a fine-tuned GPT-3.5 model. Our main contribution is the creation of an extensive multi-label dataset of approximately 60,000 data in English, and Spanish, spanning diverse dialects. This data set was obtained by combining and processing multiple datasets from reliable sources. In addition, we developed a fine-tuned model based on GPT-3.5, capable of identifying hate speech, and offensive language in textual content on social networks. We conducted a thorough evaluation comparing our model to specialized solutions such as Perspective API, Moderation, Content Safety, Toxic Bert, and Gemini. The results demonstrate that our approach outperforms existing models in metrics such as precision, f1-score, and accuracy, making it the most suitable choice for effective cyberbullying detection. This research lays the groundwork for a future app where users can be alerted to harmful content online.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85202606320&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66705-3_17; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-66705-3_17; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66705-3_17; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-66705-3_17
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know