Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Using Conventional and Soft Computing Method
Springer Series in Geomechanics and Geoengineering, ISSN: 1866-8763, Page: 3-13
2024
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
Earthquake damage in the twenty-first century has piqued the interest of numerous scholars and engineers working on enhancing the seismic safety of heavily populated regions. Prayagraj is one of India’s fastest-growing cities, is located on the banks of the Ganga and Yamuna rivers. The river Ganga transports maximum part of alluvial soil, which is an essential factor in determining soil liquefaction potential. Some of the other factors which also affects the liquefaction potential are local site conditions, and water table. The current study focuses on liquefaction potential of soil as determined by semi-empirical approaches suggested by Modified Seed method. The developed soft computing models’ assessment were compared with evaluated Liquefaction Potential which significantly matches with output of models. Therefore ANN & ANFIS models can be used for predicting Liquefaction potential of soils. The Seed’s and Idriss approach are utilized for evaluating soil liquefaction potential since it has a higher estimating capacity than other standard methods. Bore log data from SPT tests done at locations were used to evaluate the liquefaction potential. For training ANN and ANFIS models, 100 datasets from thirty-three bore wells up to a depth of ten meter were gathered, while 26 datasets were retained for verifying the models. The projected findings of ANN and ANFIS models when compared to the Seed’s and Idriss technique suggest that training ANN and ANFIS models were capable of accurately forecasting liquefaction potential.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85201004766&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68624-5_1; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-68624-5_1; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-68624-5_1; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-68624-5_1
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know