From Screenshots to Process Models: Improving Activity Identification Through Screen Text
Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, ISSN: 1865-1356, Vol: 527 LNBIP, Page: 125-137
2024
- 4Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures4
- Readers4
Conference Paper Description
The analysis for executing Robotic Process Automation (RPA) projects increasingly relies on monitoring user activities through Robotic Process Mining (RPM) techniques. Traditional approaches capture direct information using loggers that capture UI logs, i.e., sequences of events that include data from (1) the keyboard, (2) the mouse, and (3) the application elements, such as its name, the Excel cell, the clicked button, etc. Although the latter is highly relevant for identifying the activity that is being performed, this information is not accessible in virtualized environments; only screenshot data is available. This limitation necessitates activity identification based on screenshots alone. A significant challenge with this method is its sensitivity to minor interface changes, such as different zoom levels or notifications, which can cause detection failures. To address this, we propose a novel approach that, first, integrates embeddings from both screenshots and screen text obtained through OCR and, second, clusters the UI log events using these combined features to identify the activity. Our results show that this method enhances activity identification, outperforming current state-of-the-art techniques, and demonstrates promising improvements in accuracy and reliability.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85203589020&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70445-1_8; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-70445-1_8; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70445-1_8; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-70445-1_8
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know