Bounded-Ratio Gapped String Indexing
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 14899 LNCS, Page: 118-126
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In the gapped string indexing problem, one is given a text T[1..n] to preprocess. At query time, a gapped pattern P=P[α..β]P and an integer range [α..β] are provided, where P and P are strings of total length m. The goal of the query is to report all pairs of occurrences of P and P with a gap falling within [α..β]. An existing (conditional) lower bound reveals that any index with query time O~(m+occ) must occupy almost quadratic space, where occ is the output size. However, there are interesting special cases where more efficient solutions are possible. For example, queries with a bounded gap, i.e., β≤G (fixed at construction) can be answered optimally using an O~(nG) space structure. In this paper, we bring out an interesting version of the problem where rather than having a fixed upper bound on β, we fix γ and allow any β≤γ·m (i.e., allow longer gaps for longer patterns; gap-to-pattern ratio is bounded). We show that such queries can be answered optimally using an O~(nγ) space structure.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85205385585&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72200-4_9; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-72200-4_9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-72200-4_9; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-72200-4_9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know