Computer Vision and Artificial Intelligent Techniques for Medical Image Segmentation: An Overview of Technical Aspects and Introduction to State-of-Art Application
Communications in Computer and Information Science, ISSN: 1865-0937, Vol: 2167 CCIS, Page: 17-30
2024
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Medical image segmentation is a crucial task in computer vision, playing a fundamental role in applications like diagnosis, treatment planning, and medical research. This article offers a comprehensive survey of various methods employed in medical research for image segmentation. These techniques range from traditional approaches based on thresholds, regions, edges, and clustering, to modern artificial intelligence methods, particularly deep learning techniques. The strengths and limitations of each method are meticulously examined. Furthermore, recent advancements in segmentation methods are scrutinized, emphasizing their potential to enhance both accuracy and efficiency. The study presents results from multiple approaches, accompanied by a detailed analysis of the strengths and weaknesses inherent in the diverse techniques applied to medical image segmentation. This paper focuses on analyzing various architectures used for medical image segmentation, specifically evaluating their performance. It aims to deeply explore the different segmentation methods, offering a comparative perspective on their effectiveness. This study contributes to a better understanding of the applicability of these techniques in the medical field, particularly in computer vision.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85213990393&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77040-1_2; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-77040-1_2; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77040-1_2; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-77040-1_2
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know