Accurate and Efficient Real-World Fall Detection Using Time Series Techniques
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 15433 LNAI, Page: 52-79
2025
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures1
- Readers1
Conference Paper Description
Falls pose a significant health risk, particularly for older people and those with specific medical conditions. Therefore, timely fall detection is crucial for preventing fall-related complications. Existing fall detection methods often have high false alarm or false negative rates, and many rely on handcrafted features. Additionally, most approaches are evaluated using simulated falls, leading to performance degradation in real-world scenarios. This paper explores a new fall detection approach leveraging real-world fall data and state-of-the-art time series techniques. The proposed method eliminates the need for manual feature engineering and has efficient runtime. Our approach achieves high accuracy, with false alarms and false negatives each as few as one in three days on FARSEEING, a large dataset of real-world falls (mean F score: 90.7%). We also outperform existing methods on simulated falls datasets, FallAllD and SisFall. Furthermore, we investigate the performance of models trained on simulated data and tested on real-world data. This research presents a real-time fall detection framework with potential for real-world implementation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85215768057&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77066-1_4; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-77066-1_4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-77066-1_4; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-77066-1_4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know