Gamification in E-Wallets: Impact on User Satisfaction and Experience
Communications in Computer and Information Science, ISSN: 1865-0937, Vol: 2321 CCIS, Page: 249-264
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Previous studies have highlighted the benefits of gamification as a design strategy aimed at enhancing service experiences. However, there is limited understanding of the drawbacks of gamification that can result in its misuse. This paper examines the inefficiencies and ineffectiveness of gamification, particularly within the rewarding systems and money management aspects of electronic wallets. To address the challenges associated with misused gamification, it is crucial to comprehend the underlying issues in current electronic wallet rewarding and financing activities. Through qualitative analysis of interviews conducted with users before and after testing two given e-wallet prototypes, we found that simplicity and consistency in the experience of claiming rewards and making investments is essential to align with users’ preferred experience. Tangible price reductions of rewards are preferred over accumulated points, and there is a demand for location-based automatic rewards. Personalization of rewards based on spending behavior history, personalised visual spending records, and the removal of unnecessary steps such as topping up are highlighted to streamline user experience.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85215709763&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78561-0_25; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-78561-0_25; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-78561-0_25; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-78561-0_25
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know