Deep Learning-Based Differential Distinguishers for Cryptographic Sequences
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 15496 LNCS, Page: 114-133
2025
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
This research introduces a new deep learning-based technique that significantly enhances the efficiency and accuracy of deep learning based cryptographic distinguishers. By employing a sequence detection approach, we have achieved significant improvements in finding distinguishers for analyzing ciphertext sequences. Two innovative models, an LSTM-based Encoder Classifier (LbEC) and a Transformer based Encoder-only Classifier (TbEC), are proposed. The dataset has been transformed into a list of vector embeddings of the individual sequence data, which is used to train the models. Experimental results demonstrate that this approach has not only achieved results comparable to the existing related works but also outperformed some of the existing schemes. Thereby, distinguishers for HIGHT covering 16 rounds, PRESENT covering 12 rounds, LEA covering 13 rounds, SPARX covering 6 rounds and Piccolo-80 covering 9 rounds have been accomplished, which shows notable improvement over the existing best results.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85213400701&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80311-6_6; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-031-80311-6_6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80311-6_6; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-80311-6_6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know