Thresholding a Random Forest classifier
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 8888, Page: 95-106
2014
- 1Citations
- 11Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
The original Random Forest derives the final result with respect to the number of leaf nodes voted for the corresponding class. Each leaf node is treated equally and the class with the most number of votes wins. Certain leaf nodes in the topology have better classification accuracies and others often lead to a wrong decision. Also the performance of the forest for different classes differs due to uneven class proportions. In this work, a novel voting mechanism is introduced: each leaf node has an individual weight. The final decision is not determined by majority voting but rather by a linear combination of individual weights leading to a better and more robust decision. This method is inspired by the construction of a strong classifier using a linear combination of small rules of thumb (AdaBoost). Small fluctuations which are caused by the use of binary decision trees are better balanced. Experimental results on several datasets for object recognition and action recognition demonstrate that our method successfully improves the classification accuracy of the original Random Forest algorithm.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84916597623&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14364-4_10; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-14364-4_10; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-14364-4_10; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14364-4_10; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-14364-4_10
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know