A BRDF representing method based on Gaussian process
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 9009, Page: 542-553
2015
- 3Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In recent years, digital reconstruction of cultural heritage provides an effective way of protecting historical relics, in which the modeling of surface reflection of historical heritage with high fidelity places a very important role. In this paper Gaussian process (GP) regression based approach is proposed to model the reflection properties of real materials, in which the simulation data generated by the existing model are both used as the training data and the proof that Gaussian process model can be used to describe the material reflection. Matusik’s MERL database is also adopted to perform training and inference and obtain the reflection model of the real material. Simulation results show that the proposed GP regression approach can achieve a good fitting of the reflection properties of certain materials, greatly reduce the BRDF measurement time and ensure high realistic rendering at the same time.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84942549207&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16631-5_40; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-16631-5_40; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16631-5_40; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-3-319-16631-5_40
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know