Sequential decision making with medical interpretation algorithms in the semantic web
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 9088, Page: 760-771
2015
- 1Citations
- 8Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Supporting physicians in their daily work with state-of-the art technology is an important ongoing undertaking. If a radiologist wants to see the tumour region of a headscan of a new patient, a system needs to build a workflow of several interpretation algorithms all processing the image in one or the other way. If a lot of such interpretation algorithms are available, the system needs to select viable candidates, choose the optimal interpretation algorithms for the current patient and finally execute them correctly on the right data. We work towards developing such a system by using RDF and OWL to annotate interpretation algorithms and data, executing interpretation algorithms on a data-driven and declarative basis and integrating so-called meta components. These let us flexibly decide which interpretation algorithms to execute in order to optimally solve the current task.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84937485493&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18818-8_49; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-18818-8_49; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-18818-8_49; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18818-8_49; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-18818-8_49
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know