The importance of stepped-care protocols for the redesign of behavioral health care in patient-centered medical homes
Integrated Primary and Behavioral Care: Role in Medical Homes and Chronic Disease Management, Page: 97-114
2015
- 2Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures2
- Readers2
Book Chapter Description
The demonstration of treatment efficacy under relatively idealized conditions (e.g., participants are randomly assigned to treatment, excluded for comorbid conditions, and paid to enhance retention) remains the appropriate starting point for the development of evidence-based psychological health-care systems. Once efficacy treatment has been established, other considerations can become more prominent. Common targets for subsequent research include treatment effectiveness (symptom improvement under more naturalistic conditions; E.g., Fleischhacker and Goodwin (World Psychiatry 8:23-27, 2009); Seligman (American Psychologist 50:965-974, 1995)) and dissemination efforts.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84956972602&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19036-5_6; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-19036-5_6; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19036-5_6; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-19036-5_6
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know