Development and improvement of two methods of different complexity to simulate atmospheric boundary layer turbulence for aircraft design studies
Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics and Multidisciplinary Design, ISSN: 1612-2909, Vol: 131, Page: 189-202
2016
- 1Citations
- 1Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
In this paper we present two different methods to provide turbulence data for aircraft design studies. The first method is based on the discrete gust approach which describes one single gust event as analytical approximation. Based on mean gust shape calculations in turbulent wind fields obtained from high-resolution largeeddy simulations (LES), we suggest both a new one- and two-dimensional gust shape model. The one-dimensional gust shapes differ significantly from the classical one-minus-cosine gust. Two-dimensional mean gust shapes show elliptically shaped contours with varying aspect ratios for different gust diameters. The second and more complex method provides three-dimensional turbulent wind speed data from LES. This approach allows to consider explicitly the influence of buildings on aircraft during take off or landing. In order to quantify the influence of an idealized airport building on aircraft, a virtual crosswind landing trough the wake of a building was simulated within the LES data. Following the 7-knots-criterion, the building induced flow disturbances may have a significant influence on landing aircraft. Both methods will be used in future to initialize a computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model to simulate the flow around an aircraft.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84937013066&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21127-5_11; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-21127-5_11; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21127-5_11; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-21127-5_11
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know