Building personalized activity recognition models with scarce labeled data based on class similarities
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 9454, Page: 265-276
2015
- 26Citations
- 31Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
With the recent advent of new devices with embedded sensors, Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has become a trending topic in the last years because of its potential applications in pervasive health care, assisted living, exercise monitoring, etc. Most of the works on HAR either require from the user to label the activities as they are performed so the system can learn them, or rely on a trained device that expects a “typical” ideal user. The first approach is impractical, as the training process easily become time consuming, expensive, etc., while the second one drops the HAR precision for many non-typical users. In this work we propose a “crowdsourcing” method for building personalized models for HAR by combining the advantages of both user-dependent and general models by finding class similarities between the target user and the community users. We evaluated our approach on 4 different public datasets and showed that the personalized models outperformed the user-dependent and general models when labeled data is scarce.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84952328094&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26401-1_25; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-26401-1_25; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26401-1_25; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-26401-1_25
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know