Setting priorities: The timing and indications for rheumatoid surgical procedures
Clinical Management of the Rheumatoid Hand, Wrist, and Elbow, Page: 31-41
2016
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Book Chapter Description
The proper selection of rheumatoid surgical candidates and performance of the correct procedure at the appropriate time are often of greater importance than the specific surgical technique used. This chapter will seek to provide the reader with an understanding of the operative indications and guidance in individualizing surgical goals for the rheumatoid patient. The first priority is establishing patient concerns with the symptoms. These are then correlated with physical exam findings and radiographic analysis. Four indications set the basis for surgical intervention: (1) pain, (2) loss of function, (3) prevention of disease progression, and (4) aesthetic consideration. A thorough work-up and perioperative medical management plan should be in place prior to proceeding to surgery. The entire upper extremity, from the shoulder to the distal interphalangeal joints, should be assessed for evidence of rheumatologic change. In many circumstances, proximal disease or deformities impacting more distal joints should be addressed prior to correction of distal disease processes. A treatment plan that addresses the patient’s concerns and reduces the number of surgical procedures can be formulated and tailored to each individual patient. For the rheumatoid patient, the surgeon should correct as many patient concerns as possible in a single operation.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84978217243&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26660-2_4; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-26660-2_4; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-26660-2_4; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-26660-2_4
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know