A semantic-based metadata validation for an automated high-throughput screening workflow: Case study in cytomicsDB
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 9656, Page: 557-572
2016
- 3Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Metrics Details
- Captures3
- Readers3
Conference Paper Description
High-Throughput Screening (HTS) techniques are typically used to identify potential drug candidates. These type of experiments require invest in large amount of resources. The appropriate data management of HTS experiments has become a key challenge in order to succeed in the target validation. Current developments in imaging systems has to cope with computational requirements due to the significant increment of volumes of data. However, no special care has been taken to ensure the consistency, integrity and reliability of the data managed in HTS experiments. The appropriate validation of the data used in an HTS experiment has turned to be a key success factor in the target validation, thus a mandatory process to be included in the HTS workflow. This paper describes our research in the validation process as performed in CytomicsDB. This system is a modern RDBMS-based platform, designed to provide an architecture capable of dealing with the strict validation requirements during each stage of the HTS workflow. Furthermore, CytomicsDB has a flexible architecture which support easy access to external repositories in order to validate experiments data.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84973916083&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31744-1_50; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-31744-1_50; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31744-1_50; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-31744-1_50
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know