Network ranking assisted semantic data mining
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 9656, Page: 752-764
2016
- 2Citations
- 5Captures
- 1Mentions
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Most Recent Blog
Trip Report: ISWC 2017
Last week, I conferenced! I attended the 16th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2017) in Vienna at the beginning of the week and then headed up to FORCE 2017 in Berlin for the back half of the week. For the last several ISWC, I’ve been involved in the organizing committee, but this year I got to relax. It was a nice chance to just be an attendee and see what was up. This was made even ni
Conference Paper Description
Semantic data mining (SDM) uses annotated data and interconnected background knowledge to generate rules that are easily interpreted by the end user. However, the complexity of SDM algorithms is high, resulting in long running times even when applied to relatively small data sets. On the other hand, network analysis algorithms are among the most scalable data mining algorithms. This paper proposes an effective SDM approach that combines semantic data mining and network analysis. The proposed approach uses network analysis to extract the most relevant part of the interconnected background knowledge, and then applies a semantic data mining algorithm on the pruned background knowledge. The application on acute lymphoblastic leukemia data set demonstrates that the approach is well motivated, is more efficient and results in rules that are comparable or better than the rules obtained by applying the incorporated SDM algorithm without network reduction in data preprocessing.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84973885508&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31744-1_65; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-31744-1_65; http://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-319-31744-1_65; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31744-1_65; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-31744-1_65
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know