Molecular Contamination and Amplification Product Inactivation
Advanced Techniques in Diagnostic Microbiology: Volume 1: Techniques, Third Edition, Page: 505-526
2018
- 6Citations
- 5Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Laboratory strategies for diagnosing and monitoring infections now routinely include nucleic acid amplification techniques (NAATs), in particular variations of the polymerase chain reaction. These molecular approaches represent a paradigm shift and can often carry diagnostic advantages over traditional culture-based methodologies. Nevertheless, molecular infectious disease testing is not without its caveats and challenges. Notably, the high sensitivity and target amplification nature of these tests can represent a double-edged sword, as it creates the theoretical potential for false-positive results due to carryover contamination from specimen-to-specimen or amplicon-to-specimen. Clinical laboratories that conduct such assays must be acutely aware of this risk, given the potential risk for patient harm that can be caused by spurious detections. The current chapter reviews the phenomenon of carryover contamination in the molecular environment, as well as specific strategies that can be implemented to mitigate the risk as part of a molecular quality assurance program. These measures include both incorporation of biochemical techniques for amplification product inactivation—such that generated amplicons are no longer able to serve as detectable targets for future reactions—and more general practices in assay design and laboratory workflow. Special consideration is given to carryover contamination in the context quantitative assays, multiplex/syndromic molecular platforms, and broad-range PCR technologies.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85059073491&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33900-9_24; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-33900-9_24; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33900-9_24; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-33900-9_24
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know