Molecular mechanism of plant-nanoparticle interactions
Plant Nanotechnology: Principles and Practices, Page: 155-181
2016
- 37Citations
- 43Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Research and development in the field of nanotechnology are rapidly progressing in all aspects of human life. Recently, the use of engineered nanomaterial (ENM) is being conceptualized in the field of agriculture and food industry. These ENMs are often released into the environment and pose toxicity risk due to potential uptake by crop plants. Standard developmental and physiological methods to measure phytotoxicity including seed germination, root elongation, and enzymatic assays are not sensitive enough while evaluating nanoparticle toxicity to terrestrial plant species. Also, unique properties of nanomaterials allow them to interact with biological systems. Understanding the nature of interactions between nanoparticles and plants is crucial for assessing their uptake, distribution, and toxicity associated with exposure of plants to nanoparticles. However, little progress has been made toward understanding the impact of nanomaterials at molecular level, which is an important step in evaluation of the possible mechanisms of observed effects in planta. Analysis of changes in gene expression through transcriptomics constitutes a powerful approach toward understanding the mechanism of phytotoxicity and molecular responses of plants exposed to nanoparticles. Also, global protein profiling, emerging as a new field "nanotoxicoproteomics," can be used for understanding plant responses to toxic nanomaterials. The present chapter reviews the current knowledge on phytotoxicity assessment and interactions of nanoparticles with plants at the cellular level and discusses the future aspects to improve our knowledge of this field.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85009680841&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42154-4_7; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-42154-4_7; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-42154-4_7; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-42154-4_7
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know