Do we need large annotated training data for detection applications in biomedical imaging? A case study in renal glomeruli detection
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 10019 LNCS, Page: 18-26
2016
- 10Citations
- 13Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
Approaches for detecting regions of interest in biomedical image data mostly assume that a large amount of annotated training data is available. Certainly, for unchanging problem definitions, the acquisition of large annotated data is time consuming, yet feasible. However, distinct practical problems with large training corpi arise if variability due to different imaging conditions or inter-personal variations lead to significant changes in the image representation. To circumvent these issues, we investigate a classifier learning scenario which requires a small amount of positive annotation data only. Contrarily to previous approaches which focus on methodologies to explicitly or implicitly deal with specific classification scenarios (such as one-class classification), we show that existing supervised classification models can handle a changed setting effectively without any specific modifications.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=84992496422&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47157-0_3; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-47157-0_3; https://doi.org/10.1007%2F978-3-319-47157-0_3; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47157-0_3; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-47157-0_3
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know