High definition method for imaging bacteria in microconfined environments on solid media
Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics), ISSN: 1611-3349, Vol: 10209 LNCS, Page: 726-736
2017
- 1Citations
- 10Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Conference Paper Description
In this paper, the methods and devices used to confine, observe and characterize the growth of bacteria on an agar based nutrient media are described. Selected strain E. coli MG1655 [1, 2] was successfully inoculated in a confinement structure composed of a microchannel (7 µm × 60 µm × 6.345 mm) with two culture chambers of 3 mm in diameter on both ends. The microchannel was fabricated on a standard microscope glass slide using a mask-less photolithographic technique and chemical etching. Isolation and manipulation of the confined bacteria was achieved by means of a custom designed 3D printed test cell. Observation was performed on an optical transmission microscope enhanced with a customized automation system. Growth characterization was performed by calculating the surface area colonized by the bacteria through image processing and analysis. The discussion focuses on the comparison of the growth rate within the confinement structure compared to traditional cell counting methods and the description of an observed, but inconsistent, scouting behavior. Finally, we discuss on the possible uses of the reported work and extend a call for introducing this system in current bacteriology research.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85018697599&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56154-7_64; https://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-56154-7_64; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56154-7_64; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-56154-7_64
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know