Predicting mixture toxicity with models of additivity
Chemical Mixtures and Combined Chemical and Nonchemical Stressors: Exposure, Toxicity, Analysis, and Risk, Page: 235-270
2018
- 15Citations
- 23Captures
Metric Options: CountsSelecting the 1-year or 3-year option will change the metrics count to percentiles, illustrating how an article or review compares to other articles or reviews within the selected time period in the same journal. Selecting the 1-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year. Selecting the 3-year option compares the metrics against other articles/reviews that were also published in the same calendar year plus the two years prior.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Example: if you select the 1-year option for an article published in 2019 and a metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019. If you select the 3-year option for the same article published in 2019 and the metric category shows 90%, that means that the article or review is performing better than 90% of the other articles/reviews published in that journal in 2019, 2018 and 2017.
Citation Benchmarking is provided by Scopus and SciVal and is different from the metrics context provided by PlumX Metrics.
Book Chapter Description
Researchers in numerous fields (e.g., pharmacology, entomology, toxicology, and epidemiology) have attempted to model the joint action of chemicals using simple formulas based only on knowledge of individual chemical toxicity or pharmacological effect (i.e., dose-response relationships). Collectively, these formulas are referred to as "additivity models," and they are based on concepts of additivity that include dose addition, independent action, integrated addition, and effect summation. In toxicology, additivity-based predictions are often compared to observed mixture data to assess the presence and magnitude of interactions (greater-than-additive or less-than-additive) among chemicals. These models can also be used to estimate the toxicity of a defined mixture for comparison to the observed toxicity of a related, but more complex, mixture. Alternatively, additivity models have been used to explore mechanisms of joint action. In general, the steps for investigating joint toxicity using additivity models include (1) deciding on which additivity model(s) to apply (e.g., dose addition, independent action, or both), (2) collecting dose-response data on individual chemicals and the mixture, (3) incorporating individual chemical data in an additivity model to generate predictions, and (4) comparing predicted to observed mixture responses. Many of the additivity models have a long and sometimes controversial history. This chapter provides background on several of the common additivity models, illustrates their application with examples, and discusses their advantages and limitations.
Bibliographic Details
http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?partnerID=HzOxMe3b&scp=85046053231&origin=inward; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56234-6_9; http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-56234-6_9; https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-56234-6_9; https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-56234-6_9
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Provide Feedback
Have ideas for a new metric? Would you like to see something else here?Let us know